CBDT FORWARDS THE DOPT OM FOR FIXATION OF INTER-SE-SENIORITY & A WATCH OUT AT NEW DELHI CIRCLE.
On Friday CBDT has issued a letter to all CsCIT(CCA) referring the Supreme Court Judgement in the case of NR Parmar and DOPT's OM dated 3rd March 2014 and directed all the CsCIT to refix the inter-se-senerioty of PRs and DRs. It is also stating the immediate necessary action should be taken in accordance with the DOPTs OM.
Surprisingly, CBDTs letter is marked as MOST URGENT AND COURT MATTER. After 15 months since the date of Judgement, they have identified the Order as most urgent.
The only additional thing it has expressed in the the letter is that it has stated that the guidelines issued in the OM are Consolidated guidelines ( i.e. not the Amended Guide lines.)
In fact all the ITians are eagerly waiting for a clarification from the CBDT, in the view of the latest OM of DOPT, whether it is to be implemented from 1986 or from 2012.There are varied views from the latest OM of the DOPT.
In a Circular of the ITGOA (new Body) issued earlier in this month, that the Board has assured them of uniform implementation of the Judgement. In its letter is it mean the same?
NEW DELHI CIRCLE:
It is leant that the CCIT(CCA), New Delhi has issued a letter to all the CCs/DGs in his jurisdiction asking them to get ready all the vigilance clearances ready by 20th March for promotions in Group B and C cadres anticipating the likely additional posts from the CR. It has issued two separate letters in the last week for ITOs and ITIs. Interestingly, the ITEF, New Delhi circle decided to go agitation programme, starting from 19th March, if the Notification for allocation of posts by the CBDT was not issued by that date.
NB: THIS SITE IS NOT OWNED OR MAINTAINED BY ANY OF THE LEADERS OF THE ITEF OR ITGOA.THIS IS AN INDEPENDENT ONE AND IS MANAGED BY A GROUP OF COMMON MEN WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT. WE THANK YOU SINCERELY FOR YOUR CO-OPERATION AND RESPONSE.
7 comments:
The action of ITEF, Delhi Circle is very much appreciated and hope the other Circles will also follow the steps taken by the Delhi Circle. Now a days, the employees of this department is feeling cheated and are vey much depressed due to non-implementatioon of the CR and non-activeness of the CHQ towards its implementation.
The CHQ is working mainly for the interests of the two larger stake holders i.e. Kolkata & Mumbai keeping in mind the upcoming election of the Central leadership scheduled to be held in the next year.
Due to least interest of the CHQ, the CR is not impletmented till date after lapse of more than 09 months.
The CHQ is demanding more & more posts in all cadres for the larger stake holders, but never think upon the smaller CCIT (CCA) regions, e.g Bihar & Jharkhand, MP & CG, Orissa, etc.
It is very unfortunate that the CCIT (CCA) region, Bihar & Jharkhand had been given very less number of posts in all cadres, especially in the cadre of ITO in the previous CR. As a resut, the TDS Wing & TRO of this region is functioning with ‘ZERO’ sanctioned strength of ITOs. Besides, the Audit Wing is running with less numbers of ITOs. As a result, there is difference of near about 50 posts in the cadre of ITOs as compared to the sanctioned & functional post.
But, the CHQ never think upon these shortage of posts especially in the cadre of ITOs.
I am wonder to see that a OM issued in 1986 is to be effective from 2012. Can it say, the 1986 OM is implemented in one manner for some people who got rightly implemented and in another manner for other people. Is it done'nt mean that the DOPT breaching the right to equality and natural justice?. It is absurd.So, friends, DOPT onceagain will not take such risk. The interpretation by the PR friends is wrong. What is the necessity for DOPT to be castigated by the SC again and again?. By now, it has withdrawn its OM of 2008. So my dear friends it has to be interpreted that the OM is to be implemented from 2012 without fail also to be implemented since its issue of OM i.e. 1986. That means the OM to be implemented retrospectively since 1986. there is no other go to escape.
The supreme court of India in civil appeal No. 979 OF 2014 held that the advertisement must specify the number of posts available for selection and recruitment. The qualifications and other eligibility criteria for such posts should be explicitly provided and the schedule of recruitment process should be published with certainty and clarity. The advertisement should also specify the rules under which the selection is to be made and in absence of the rules, the procedure under which the selection is likely to be undertaken. This is necessary to prevent arbitrariness and to avoid change of criteria of selection after the selection process is commenced, thereby unjustly benefiting someone at the cost of others. Further it held that Even under the Constitution, the power of appointment granted to the Chief Justice under Article 229 (1) is subject to Article 16 (1), which guarantees equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment. ‘Opportunity’ as used in this Article means chance of employment and what it guaranteed is that this opportunity of employment would be equally available to all. This judgement is applicable to the Staff selection commision,the recruting agency is voilating the article14 and 16(1) since 2005 onwards. As SSC is advertising less number of posts and recruting in larger number of candidates. That means back door appointments.
So all the back door appointments should exit on back door at the earliest.
The declaration of the authors that they do not belong to office bearers of ITEF or ITGOA it self shows that they belong to office bearers of service associations.
Bhai ye rumour update karte hain. ..they don't know what's going on. ..they juz cut paste from simpleincometax blog who himself is spreading rumour
CR is giving twists, turns and more suspense than a thriller movie. Congrats to all those (CBDT, ITEF, ITGOA, IRS, Committee members, DR/PR members etc.,) involved in this great thrill entertaining exercise.
Who said the file has been approved by the FM? The file is still with Revenue Secretary. Dont spread rumors.
Post a Comment